FAQ - Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection

The Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection (PR&PP) evaluation approach, developed by the GIF PRPP Working Group, is a systematic methodology designed to assess and optimize the security and proliferation resistance of nuclear energy systems at all design stages. This FAQ page addresses key aspects of PR&PP, including its development, application, and the expertise required to perform evaluations. You'll find information on the level of effort and time needed for an evaluation, how PR&PP relates to IAEA safeguards and other methodologies, and the benefits of early analysis in the design process.

Presentations
PR&PP
Updated on 02/12/2024

The Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection (PR&PP) evaluation methodology is an essential tool for support the security and proliferation resistance of nuclear energy systems throughout their design and development. This comprehensive FAQ page provides detailed insights into the PR&PP approach, explaining its purpose, the level of effort and expertise required, and the potential benefits of early implementation in the design process. The page also explores the differences between PR&PP and other evaluation methodologies, such as the IAEA's INPRO, and clarifies the relationship between PR&PP evaluations and IAEA safeguards. This resource is designed to guide designers, policymakers, and regulators in making informed decisions that enhance the security and reliability of nuclear energy systems.

 

The FAQ covers the following questions:

  1. What is the Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection (PR&PP) evaluation approach?
  2. Why was the PR&PP methodology developed?
  3. What is the level of effort needed to perform a PR&PP evaluation?
  4. What is the time needed to perform a PR&PP evaluation?
  5. What is the form of the results?
  6. Who would use the results?
  7. What is the expertise needed to perform an evaluation?
  8. What is the purpose of the PR&PP white papers on the six Gen-IV systems?
  9. How is PR&PP taken into account with small modular reactors?
  10. How does a PR&PP evaluation differ from an IAEA INPRO evaluation of proliferation resistance?
  11. What is the relation between PR&PP and IAEA safeguards?
  12. Does PR&PP apply to national or sub-national actors?
  13. How does a PR&PP evaluation relate to a safety and reliability evaluation?
  14. At what stage of an evaluation should a PR&PP evaluation be performed?
  15. To what type of systems does a PR&PP evaluation apply?
  16. Are there other methodologies for performing similar evaluations?
  17. Will the PR&PP methodology be updated or is it in final form?
  18. What are benefits to performing PR&PP analysis early in the design process?
  19. Where can I find more information?